[NIFL-ESL:6971] Phonotactics

From: John Nissen (jn@tommy.demon.co.uk)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 12:42:42 EST


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id g0KHggn07789; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:42:42 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:42:42 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <103368@tommy.demon.co.uk>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: jn@tommy.demon.co.uk (John Nissen)
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:6971] Phonotactics
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Mailer: PCElm 1.11
Status: O
Content-Length: 1868
Lines: 49

Hello Charles,

I'm interested in this phonological model where the [s] counts
as its own syllable.  This would correspond to a French origin,
where the e acute is changed to an s, as in E'cole changing to
School, or the dropping of e, as in esquire changing to squire.
Presumably the [s] is treated as a kind of vowel, though it would
often be unvoiced.

For the circumflex we sometimes added an s, as in co^te changing 
to coast.  Would that also count as a syllable in this model?

And would the xt in text count as a syllable [kst]?

As a more general question, what is the place for a study of 
syllables (phonotactics) in teaching/learning ESL?

Cheers from Chiswick,

John
--
In message <008101c19f13$1d151340$09150785@fedu.fukuiu.ac.jp> 
nifl-esl@nifl.gov writes:

>> Interesting examples.
>> As for the 3 consonant cluster principle, what about the longest
>> single-syllable word in English:  strengths?Katie
>
>In one phonological model that I know of, the initial [s] counts as its own
>syllable. Still, most native speaker intuition (typically leavened with
>native literacy) would reject this.
>
>Meanwhile, in typical speech you can count on the [th] and the [s] sounds to
>do something together since they are so similar phonetically, which makes
>them hard to say (and the [th] sound is already hard to say by itself). To
>me it seem the [th] drops out and adds a bit of aspiration to the [s].
>Moreover, although the spelling would have you think [ng] are two sounds, in
>phonemic treatments they are considered one (though this does show something
>of a featural element in English orthography).
>
>Charles Jannuzi

-- 
Access the word, access the world! -- Try our WordAloud software!!

John Nissen, Cloudworld Ltd., Chiswick, London
Tel:   +44 (0) 845 458 3944 (local rate in the UK)
Fax:   +44 (0) 20 8742 8715
Web:   http://www.cloudworld.co.uk



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 17 2003 - 14:43:56 EST