Return-Path: <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id j97El2G14137; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:47:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:47:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <006301c5cb4e$da9172e0$0302a8c0@frodo> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Marie Cora" <marie.cora@hotspurpartners.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-assessment@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ASSESSMENT:1269] Discussion posts from nifl-technology X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; Status: O Content-Length: 959 Lines: 26 Hi everyone, A quick note about the forwarded messages from the technology list. Since Ira posted his question regarding digital vs. print materials (and a good one indeed) to the Assessment List, I wanted to send Mariann's follow-up reply so that you can see where that discussion is heading. Sounds very interesting. However, I will refrain from forwarding any more of the Technology posts on that subject as it is moving away from the focus of assessment. I also don't want to make List Members confused with all these forwarded messages. I encourage you to join that conversation on the NIFL-Technology Listserv. Please go to: http://www.nifl.gov/lincs/discussions/nifl-technology/technology_literac y.html and follow the simple directions for subscribing. If other messages come through on NIFL-Tech that respond directly to assessing via computers, I will indeed make sure that those messages get posted here on NIFL-Assessment. Thanks! marie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 31 2005 - 09:48:53 EST